wool Opal Hundertwasser Save the City "6x yarn
Saturday, February 19, 2011
Thursday, February 17, 2011
Greco Roman Wrestling Schools In Nyc
workflow events to changes
If the workflow run-time system is set up in an SAP system once It supports the expansion of all business processes - in many cases without additional programming, model-based approach with a. By Workflow Builder can processes in the BOR (Business Object Repository ) objects defined in conjunction with manual steps (decisions, notices, etc.) defined and implemented based on.
basic idea is the loose coupling of customizebare BOR events at consumers. The coupling can also still be in the production system on and off. Estimated workflows, tasks, BOR methods or class or function blocks are. The triggering event is pervasive throughout the system. There is hardly an economically relevant event in the workflow system does not find a correlation. Typical examples include the installation of new evidence or a change of system or user status. Naturally, workflow events can be triggered programmatically (if improbably but missing even one should), for which one method raise class cl_swf_evt_event should use.
Here I want to show how you can register for the amendment of certain fields in the item master. In this specific case, should a consumer for the change of two particular Register fields. In order not to trigger any now for change an event, it seemed necessary to define a custom event to change just for this case.
events are part of BOR objects. To free of modifications to define a new event, I have defined a subtype of the BOR object BUS1001001 (commercial products):
the new type ZBU1001001 I use to define a new event FIELDSET_CHANGED :
This workflow event must now be tied to the changes of the article master. The SAP system requires continuous changes to business objects in the tables CDHDR and CDPOS . It is for each business object has a type code, called the change document object. When developing the business object (ie, generally in the SAP standard development) of this change document object is created, whereby automatic function modules generated for updating. Does that change document object such as MAT_FULL , so get the associated function module called MAT_FULL_WRITE_DOCUMENT . This block is then, generally in the delayed update (V2) is called when you save the business object.
In order to notify the change document object, that it should trigger the event of a BOR object, we define a map in the transaction SWEC .
The detail screen for this line, you can specify the condition editor, for example, nor that the event should be triggered only when changing certain fields:
After these settings caused the new event. Up to this point let's all done with the naked Customizing. If there must be linked to the event to a consumer, you can decide: If you want to own a specific consumer To implement or can you model the desired functions within a workflow. The often desired 08/15-Fall think anyone would like an e-mail alerts, can be almost always solved by workflow resources without programming. The use of a workflow task to an e-mail generation has the additional advantage that the header and detail data is the mail user adjustable, can be used as the wildcard application data.
If one wants to, can couple is also programmed logic to the event. In the following event-type coupling, for example, the function module Z_CONSUME_FIELDSET_CHANGED with the new Event FIELDSET_CHANGED linked. The coupling is given a symbolic name (which is not further validated in the system), here MARA_FIELDSET_CHANGED :
have
The function module must have the following interface and is otherwise freely definable. The internal table EVENT_CONTAINER contains detailed data for the application object: in this case, the number of the change document.
is worth mentioning, that for a very useful workflow events Trace is that a transaction on the Swel can turn on and off (the switch is of course important, particularly in the productive system). In transaction Swel you can view the log of the event trace. For testing, I have successively carried out two field changes. The log shows that each triggered the event and identified the consumer in accordance with the coupling MARA_FIELDSET_CHANGED and was started correctly.
If the workflow run-time system is set up in an SAP system once It supports the expansion of all business processes - in many cases without additional programming, model-based approach with a. By Workflow Builder can processes in the BOR (Business Object Repository ) objects defined in conjunction with manual steps (decisions, notices, etc.) defined and implemented based on.
basic idea is the loose coupling of customizebare BOR events at consumers. The coupling can also still be in the production system on and off. Estimated workflows, tasks, BOR methods or class or function blocks are. The triggering event is pervasive throughout the system. There is hardly an economically relevant event in the workflow system does not find a correlation. Typical examples include the installation of new evidence or a change of system or user status. Naturally, workflow events can be triggered programmatically (if improbably but missing even one should), for which one method raise class cl_swf_evt_event should use.
Here I want to show how you can register for the amendment of certain fields in the item master. In this specific case, should a consumer for the change of two particular Register fields. In order not to trigger any now for change an event, it seemed necessary to define a custom event to change just for this case.
events are part of BOR objects. To free of modifications to define a new event, I have defined a subtype of the BOR object BUS1001001 (commercial products):
the new type ZBU1001001 I use to define a new event FIELDSET_CHANGED :
This workflow event must now be tied to the changes of the article master. The SAP system requires continuous changes to business objects in the tables CDHDR and CDPOS . It is for each business object has a type code, called the change document object. When developing the business object (ie, generally in the SAP standard development) of this change document object is created, whereby automatic function modules generated for updating. Does that change document object such as MAT_FULL , so get the associated function module called MAT_FULL_WRITE_DOCUMENT . This block is then, generally in the delayed update (V2) is called when you save the business object.
In order to notify the change document object, that it should trigger the event of a BOR object, we define a map in the transaction SWEC .
The detail screen for this line, you can specify the condition editor, for example, nor that the event should be triggered only when changing certain fields:
After these settings caused the new event. Up to this point let's all done with the naked Customizing. If there must be linked to the event to a consumer, you can decide: If you want to own a specific consumer To implement or can you model the desired functions within a workflow. The often desired 08/15-Fall think anyone would like an e-mail alerts, can be almost always solved by workflow resources without programming. The use of a workflow task to an e-mail generation has the additional advantage that the header and detail data is the mail user adjustable, can be used as the wildcard application data.
If one wants to, can couple is also programmed logic to the event. In the following event-type coupling, for example, the function module Z_CONSUME_FIELDSET_CHANGED with the new Event FIELDSET_CHANGED linked. The coupling is given a symbolic name (which is not further validated in the system), here MARA_FIELDSET_CHANGED :
have
The function module must have the following interface and is otherwise freely definable. The internal table EVENT_CONTAINER contains detailed data for the application object: in this case, the number of the change document.
z_consume_fieldset_changed function.
*"-----------------------------------------------
----------------------- * "*" Local interface:
* "IMPORTING
*" VALUE (EVENT) EVENT TYPE SWETYPECOU
* "VALUE (RECTYPE) TYPE SWETYPECOU-RECTYPE
*" VALUE (OBJTYPE) TYPE SWETYPECOU-OBJTYPE
* "VALUE (OBJKEY) TYPE SWEINSTCOU-OBJKEY
*" VALUE (EXCEPTIONS_ALLOWED) TYPE SWEFLAGS-EXC_OK
DEFAULT SPACE * "EXPORTING
* "VALUE (REC_ID) TYPE Swelog-recid
*" TABLES *
"EVENT_CONTAINER STRUCTURE SWCONT
*"--------------------------- -------------------------------------------
is worth mentioning, that for a very useful workflow events Trace is that a transaction on the Swel can turn on and off (the switch is of course important, particularly in the productive system). In transaction Swel you can view the log of the event trace. For testing, I have successively carried out two field changes. The log shows that each triggered the event and identified the consumer in accordance with the coupling MARA_FIELDSET_CHANGED and was started correctly.
Wednesday, February 16, 2011
2002 Arctic Cat 500 Tbx Reviews
Minimalist JavaScript library
is HTML, as Stefan Münz it so beautifully said, the lingua franca of the Web : HTML is the language in which you should speak as a server with a browser - flanked by CSS code for the compact and reusable notation style, and JavaScript code for the implementation of client behavior . Many magnificent buildings erected, however, in the form of Web Application Frameworks and think of funny names for them, only to its users from direct contact with these supposedly terrible triad preserved: When would a developer in the sight of HTML, CSS JavaScript code and solidify into stone.
But this magnificent building to put all not really. To avoid interest, overhead through additional, often not really needed indirection is higher than the fear, but to really use accidentally once an HTML notation of Netscape Navigator 4.0 does not everything is interpreted correctly. And as HTML, CSS and even JavaScript are easy to learn, scares the audience to which the magnificent building, business, actually, not shy, instead of working with abstract framework directly on the HTML level. Moreover, it for content management and web applications are a lot of competing solutions, so that one moves when using a specific framework to dependence.
Who is therefore one of the large group of web application, which formulate their applications directly with HTML, CSS and JavaScript, without using such terrible things as WYSIWYG editors with automatic HTML code generation, which is not a Framework need, but a library of JavaScript functions. And for three reasons:
Now there are a number of JavaScript libraries for such purposes. But every library would naturally be very good and comprehensive, the competition in all the above points, beat by a mile. As awakened the ambition of the library developers, and the libraries are really better and more comprehensive - but also bigger. dojo 5.1 uncompressed has 370 KB (compressed still 88), jQuery 5.1 207 KB (compressed 82) has, and Prototype 1.7 has 169 KB uncompressed (and does not offer a compressed version, but when I Marcia Frank JS Minifie used to reduce Prototype 1.7 to 120 KB). The concern is, after all: Do you really need such large libraries?
One could argue that the Parsezeiten for libraries of this size is already negligible , while the JavaScript interpreter will still be optimized further proof (from IE9 you hear about fantastic performance results that even Google Chrome's V8 silver bullet are still in the shade). For applications that work with the classic form-submit-cycles, this suggests Parsezeit but in each dialog step book. It is appropriate in each case, the principle of economy: Why should I download something that is too large parts not needed or used? Later can not say exactly which functions are actually used in what parts of the application.
is why the question is: What features are needed most often, or give a very big benefit?
are sure to have easy access DOM functions . The functions $ () and $ $ () in Prototype and jQuery are using the syntax of CSS selectors to extract sets of nodes from the HTML DOM. This is a compact syntax that is well received and understood by the target group and will be read. A good choice. But the parser for the Selektorstrings wants to be first written. Even a mere abbreviation for the prattling document.getElementById makes the code easier to read
With Iteratorfunktionen fill the libraries another hole in the JavaScript language support. This is indeed closed forEach with JavaScript 1.6 through methods such as . But until then I do not like to wait. With a few lines of code can fill the gap, as I object to the array of the JavaScript standard, a new method by each slide. The implementation used in the "programmed out" Index-based (that is necessarily ugly) loop helps many index-based loops in the application code more readable by each () to replace constructs [1].
all () that determine whether one or each element a condition of the array feature met, I do not think so important. A filter or subset function, however, is helpful to allow chained method calls: form / / --- subset (filter) / / The subset of all array elements
/ / for the true, the filter function is
byTagName (tagname, parentNode) and byClass (className, parentNode) (the second parameter parentNode is optional, not to search the entire document must, but all the nodes that are below parentNode). It should be noted that the native implementation of the return value as a DOM function getElementsByTagName not an array must be, but according to the DOM specification only NodeList . The implementation of this NodeList is browser specific and not expandable in any browser. In order ie the return value each () iterate can, the result will unfortunately be displayed in an array: / / Shortcut for getElementsByTagName function byTagName (tagname, theParent) {
var i, n, result = [] ;.
complex and nested conditions can be realized with the function byCondition (condition, parentNode)
, traversing the tree from the given element and collects all the elements for which the function evaluates condition
/ / --- All the elements that satisfy a condition byCondition function (condition children, theParent) {var , n , i, result = []; children = (theParent condition, children [i]));} } return result;}
. / / --- Cross-browser HTTP Request
/ / callback, data, action, header fields are optional
function doRequest (url, callback, data, action, header fields) { var field, value, theData = data requestor.open (! action / / --- Cross-browser register a function function registerFor (theElement, theEvent, theHandler) { var eventNormalized; if (typeof theHandler = "function") { alert ("bug: Only functions can be registered"); return;} var f = function (e) {theHandler.call (getSource (e), e);} if (window.addEventListener) {
eventNormalized theEvent.replace = (/ ^ on /, "" ) / / f always without "on"
theElement.addEventListener (eventNormalized, false);}
), but the function
doOnLoad
Target
(as in Mozilla):
[1] The each function is written so that it runs each with the same functional () function of the Prototype framework. This is deliberately done so that prototype when needed and can be used minlib.js simultaneously.
is HTML, as Stefan Münz it so beautifully said, the lingua franca of the Web : HTML is the language in which you should speak as a server with a browser - flanked by CSS code for the compact and reusable notation style, and JavaScript code for the implementation of client behavior . Many magnificent buildings erected, however, in the form of Web Application Frameworks and think of funny names for them, only to its users from direct contact with these supposedly terrible triad preserved: When would a developer in the sight of HTML, CSS JavaScript code and solidify into stone.
But this magnificent building to put all not really. To avoid interest, overhead through additional, often not really needed indirection is higher than the fear, but to really use accidentally once an HTML notation of Netscape Navigator 4.0 does not everything is interpreted correctly. And as HTML, CSS and even JavaScript are easy to learn, scares the audience to which the magnificent building, business, actually, not shy, instead of working with abstract framework directly on the HTML level. Moreover, it for content management and web applications are a lot of competing solutions, so that one moves when using a specific framework to dependence.
Who is therefore one of the large group of web application, which formulate their applications directly with HTML, CSS and JavaScript, without using such terrible things as WYSIWYG editors with automatic HTML code generation, which is not a Framework need, but a library of JavaScript functions. And for three reasons:
- certain functions because he always needed and therefore they program only once, like (Do not Repeat Yourself )
- implemented in order to browser-specific to the features to access an abstraction,
- to the specific JavaScript code for the Web application to read fluently and to formulate yet compact.
Now there are a number of JavaScript libraries for such purposes. But every library would naturally be very good and comprehensive, the competition in all the above points, beat by a mile. As awakened the ambition of the library developers, and the libraries are really better and more comprehensive - but also bigger. dojo 5.1 uncompressed has 370 KB (compressed still 88), jQuery 5.1 207 KB (compressed 82) has, and Prototype 1.7 has 169 KB uncompressed (and does not offer a compressed version, but when I Marcia Frank JS Minifie used to reduce Prototype 1.7 to 120 KB). The concern is, after all: Do you really need such large libraries?
One could argue that the Parsezeiten for libraries of this size is already negligible , while the JavaScript interpreter will still be optimized further proof (from IE9 you hear about fantastic performance results that even Google Chrome's V8 silver bullet are still in the shade). For applications that work with the classic form-submit-cycles, this suggests Parsezeit but in each dialog step book. It is appropriate in each case, the principle of economy: Why should I download something that is too large parts not needed or used? Later can not say exactly which functions are actually used in what parts of the application.
is why the question is: What features are needed most often, or give a very big benefit?
are sure to have easy access DOM functions . The functions $ () and $ $ () in Prototype and jQuery are using the syntax of CSS selectors to extract sets of nodes from the HTML DOM. This is a compact syntax that is well received and understood by the target group and will be read. A good choice. But the parser for the Selektorstrings wants to be first written. Even a mere abbreviation for the prattling document.getElementById makes the code easier to read
/ / shortcut for document.getElementById
byId function (id)
{return document.getElementById (id);}
With Iteratorfunktionen fill the libraries another hole in the JavaScript language support. This is indeed closed forEach with JavaScript 1.6 through methods such as . But until then I do not like to wait. With a few lines of code can fill the gap, as I object to the array of the JavaScript standard, a new method by each slide. The implementation used in the "programmed out" Index-based (that is necessarily ugly) loop helps many index-based loops in the application code more readable by each () to replace constructs [1].
/ / --- Array iteration with each ()
/ / The callback function receives the value of the array element as "this"
/ / The argument is the current array index passed
var _break = {}; / / Special Exception to break out each ()
Array.prototype.each = function (f, context) {var i
, n = this.length;
if (typeof f = "function") {alert
(" bug: each argument must be a function ");
return;}
try {for (i = 0; i \u0026lt;n; + + i) {
f.call (context catch (e) {
if (e! = _break) {throw e;}}
};
Iteratorfunktionen more like
any () and
all () that determine whether one or each element a condition of the array feature met, I do not think so important. A filter or subset function, however, is helpful to allow chained method calls: form / / --- subset (filter) / / The subset of all array elements
/ / for the true, the filter function is
array . prototype.subset = function (filter) {var
result = [];
this.each (function () {
if (filter.call (this)) {Result.push (this);}}
);
return result;}
;
Now even more DOM access functions are written as
byname (name, parentNode) and byTagName (tagname, parentNode) and byClass (className, parentNode) (the second parameter parentNode is optional, not to search the entire document must, but all the nodes that are below parentNode). It should be noted that the native implementation of the return value as a DOM function getElementsByTagName not an array must be, but according to the DOM specification only NodeList . The implementation of this NodeList is browser specific and not expandable in any browser. In order ie the return value each () iterate can, the result will unfortunately be displayed in an array: / / Shortcut for getElementsByTagName function byTagName (tagname, theParent) {
var i, n, result = [] ;.
var nodeList = (theParent with ID
address data
designated form as name / value pairs to collect in a hash, I have to write:.
var fields = {};
byTagName ("input", byId ("address data")) each (function {this.value
fields [this.name] =;}
());
complex and nested conditions can be realized with the function byCondition (condition, parentNode)
, traversing the tree from the given element and collects all the elements for which the function evaluates condition
an array and does not need to be expanded, again an index-based loop is necessary. The more necessary index-based loops, however, we can extract in a library, the less they have the necessary application code):
to
true (again, because
NodeList
/ / --- All the elements that satisfy a condition byCondition function (condition children, theParent) {var , n , i, result = []; children = (theParent condition, children [i]));} } return result;}
, I do not show here. It is taken directly from the Wikipedia article on XMLHttpRequest
You can use the information contained in
byCondition
traversal of the DOM also isolated: Who has
byCondition
, has no need, even programmed at any point once the recursive through all elements of the DOM.
What you need is certainly a function
doRequest (url, callback, data, contentType)
, the HTTP requests through out (only the first two arguments are mandatory) and receives the specified callback function in a wrapper to readyState when they call
= 4
. For most browsers, including IE 7, can then be accessed on the XMLHttpRequest object
. For earlier versions of IE can use fallback objects. This code for instance procurement, wrapped in the function
getRequestor ()
. / / --- Cross-browser HTTP Request
/ / callback, data, action, header fields are optional
function doRequest (url, callback, data, action, header fields) { var field, value, theData = data requestor.open (! action / / --- Cross-browser register a function function registerFor (theElement, theEvent, theHandler) { var eventNormalized; if (typeof theHandler = "function") { alert ("bug: Only functions can be registered"); return;} var f = function (e) {theHandler.call (getSource (e), e);} if (window.addEventListener) {
eventNormalized theEvent.replace = (/ ^ on /, "" ) / / f always without "on"
theElement.addEventListener (eventNormalized, false);}
else {
eventNormalized theEvent.replace (/^(?! = on) /, "on"); / / Always "on"
theElement.attachEvent (eventNormalized, f);}
}
The validation that the passed dentist really is a feature that is very useful for many developers to write out of habit
registerFor ( window, "load", doOnLoad
()
) / / wrong!
what is fundamentally wrong, of course (they do it because they do since DOM Level 0 are used to write event handlers directly in HTML). The parentheses after
doOnLoad
are wrong here: it is certainly not the handler function at the time of the call to
registerFor
evaluates and registers the result of this call will be reserved (the most
undefined or false
), but the function
doOnLoad
for later execution at the time(like Microsoft) I think the way better than
load. An event handler must
access the element can, which was triggered by the event. The easiest way is to ready this element of the function already as
this argument, as seems to be solved in Prototype. This also makes my registration function
registerFor
: As you can see not is the given function (
theHandler
) itself, but a wrapper
f
registered for the event triggering first determined the event source and supports that
this argument with this item. Which have been used cross-browser function
getSource (event)
is basically a one-liner, but such things should we write down only once - the designation as
Source
Target
(as in Mozilla):
/ / Cross-browser identifying an event source function getSource (event) {{var e = event I will not expand significantly: http://ruediger-plantiko.net/minlib/ minlib.js is actually incurred in refactoring my MVC JavaScript library global.js . Interestingly, the file before and after the refactoring about the same size (namely, 20KB), although behind the minlib features included! That is, the 8KB I have with the refactoring of the rest, MVC-specific part are raised by the code, I could now formulate compact! The result was a more readable file that had grown to some useful re-usable functions.
return event & & event.target
[1] The each function is written so that it runs each with the same functional () function of the Prototype framework. This is deliberately done so that prototype when needed and can be used minlib.js simultaneously.
Sunday, February 13, 2011
Vladmodels In österreich Legal
140 characters are enough?
TweetDeck, the Twitter client now has a feature that allows you to write about the service also deck.ly messages longer than 140 characters. That is if nothing special, but because creating and dereferencing the news TweetDeck in automatically in the background, the service raises quite pleasant on competitor ... TweetDeck-at least for users like me.
All Others see a tweet that is only with the first signs and a link to the rest, read what the timeline makes it very inconvenient if the proportion shortened Tweets takes over. Who uses these services to excessively may not be surprised if he / she loses a lot of followers.
Nevertheless I would Rejoice when Twitter would offer an official solution to circumvent the 140-character limit. This solution would have a good chance to work client-cross.
The question remains whether such a service would be accepted by Twitter users at all. When (non-representative) discussion this morning outweighed the negative voices that want to hold on to the 140 character limit.
I also personally think that Twitter with unlimited Tweetlänge would not work because the service would then suffocate in Monster Tweets without the letter.
However, I think that Twitter could benefit from an increase in the limit entirely. The 140-character limitation is considered technically stem from the fact that a tweet should fit together with some metadata in a text of 160 characters.
In the age of smart phones with specially focused on Twitter Apps I find this feature dispensable, particularly since SMS can now be longer than 160 characters and is an alternative to MMS for even longer texts. Cost should not be an argument, because if the Twitter user a text manually on several tweets (and SMS) distributed or splits, the system only for the few long Tweets SMS users automatically makes the SMS costs no difference. Without SMS-Flat is likely the use of Twitter via SMS rather pointless anyway be.
contrast, suggest a moderate increase in the following points:
Before the "traditionalists" now sharpen the knives, I want to stress again that I thought the core of Twitter ("Keep it short!") Does not want to upset. I just think that Twitter in its current form still gives away much of his potential.
a limit in the status text limit on Facebook, I would find useful. That should be somewhere around 420 characters.
Unfortunately Facebook is not a substitute for Twitter, as both services have completely different target groups: Facebook is more for the networking of people you already know, while Twitter is rather an ad hoc network where You can even have his master-follower, characterized by the hashtags and continually re-tweets and also dynamically regroup, such as when a TV program is watched together. makes
Twitter makes it easy to expand his own horizons and acquaintances, so it should in my opinion, Twitter return back to the old practice, see also mentions to people you do not follow themselves.
this in mind: What do you think about the 140-character limit, how and for what uses her Facebook and Twitter? 
TweetDeck, the Twitter client now has a feature that allows you to write about the service also deck.ly messages longer than 140 characters. That is if nothing special, but because creating and dereferencing the news TweetDeck in automatically in the background, the service raises quite pleasant on competitor ... TweetDeck-at least for users like me.
All Others see a tweet that is only with the first signs and a link to the rest, read what the timeline makes it very inconvenient if the proportion shortened Tweets takes over. Who uses these services to excessively may not be surprised if he / she loses a lot of followers.
Nevertheless I would Rejoice when Twitter would offer an official solution to circumvent the 140-character limit. This solution would have a good chance to work client-cross.
The question remains whether such a service would be accepted by Twitter users at all. When (non-representative) discussion this morning outweighed the negative voices that want to hold on to the 140 character limit.
I also personally think that Twitter with unlimited Tweetlänge would not work because the service would then suffocate in Monster Tweets without the letter.
However, I think that Twitter could benefit from an increase in the limit entirely. The 140-character limitation is considered technically stem from the fact that a tweet should fit together with some metadata in a text of 160 characters.
In the age of smart phones with specially focused on Twitter Apps I find this feature dispensable, particularly since SMS can now be longer than 160 characters and is an alternative to MMS for even longer texts. Cost should not be an argument, because if the Twitter user a text manually on several tweets (and SMS) distributed or splits, the system only for the few long Tweets SMS users automatically makes the SMS costs no difference. Without SMS-Flat is likely the use of Twitter via SMS rather pointless anyway be.
contrast, suggest a moderate increase in the following points:
- It is possible to sometimes can verbalize a more complex idea of what would certainly be conducive to the general level. Where extreme oversimplification of complex relationships can lead, can be read every morning in the tabloid or look in the "science magazines" of some private broadcasters.
- The names of recipients and hashtags (keywords for categorizing tweets) go on the 140 characters, so is the real message even less space available. Without tags, you can but no tweets on specific topics let's selective. What use is the best tweet when it is barely read?
- Some stylistic devices such as irony and sarcasm require the use of certain words and die as soon as you have always expressed to the shortest possible way. I am sorry because I think dry humor via Twitter is not often get transported, while Twitter is supposed to be a very subjective, individual medium.
- The time-trim with a deal to spend a text to 140 characters, you could put in more useful things.
- In several tweets split retweet content can hardly be (quote) without the context and the meaning is lost.
Before the "traditionalists" now sharpen the knives, I want to stress again that I thought the core of Twitter ("Keep it short!") Does not want to upset. I just think that Twitter in its current form still gives away much of his potential.
a limit in the status text limit on Facebook, I would find useful. That should be somewhere around 420 characters.
Unfortunately Facebook is not a substitute for Twitter, as both services have completely different target groups: Facebook is more for the networking of people you already know, while Twitter is rather an ad hoc network where You can even have his master-follower, characterized by the hashtags and continually re-tweets and also dynamically regroup, such as when a TV program is watched together. makes
Twitter makes it easy to expand his own horizons and acquaintances, so it should in my opinion, Twitter return back to the old practice, see also mentions to people you do not follow themselves.
this in mind: What do you think about the 140-character limit, how and for what uses her Facebook and Twitter?
Beatiful Agony Online
Allah is not the West!
On 11 September 2001, I had a normal working day at SAP in Walldorf. On the way home I noticed the large, main entrance mounted monitor, were usually the broadcast SAP information and marketing movies. That evening he showed in a special broadcast the shocking pictures of the murders committed in the name of Allah. A cluster of colleagues had already formed about the head-shaking and visibly shocked watched the images. Also, I was stunned. For me, this day was a turning point and a cruel revelation. I felt like I was inside party. All differences that exist in the West, be it between conservatives and liberals, between Civil, socialists or communists, whether between Christians and Jews, agnostics and atheists, all these differences were suddenly insignificant, given the war of barbarism against civilization ( Wafa Sultan ) [1], which manifested itself here. All the imperfections and injustices of Western systems were small and insignificant in the face of this collapse of brute force. The Somali Ayaan Hirsi Ali was as shocked and stunned many in the West as grown men. She saw herself at that time as a Muslim herself. Again and again she read the arguments of Osama bin Laden, that justified these deeds. It examined the Koran and found that it was true, the Koran requires really killing infidels, it can indicate nothing about [2] Thus the decision was certain that she had to leave Islam back.. They, too, for this day was therefore a turning point. She wrote that she was not easy to break away from the fear of punishment in hell. Long after its rejection by the Muslim faith, she found herself in guilt before God. On the whole, their balance is positive - they could finally live in a civilized society, their desire for freedom. Even better, it would be natural if they do not under constant police protection should, as from the ranks of their former religious community they threaten her with murder - as any "apostate" (dramatizing for: Resigned) is under Islamic law of death: And if they turn back, then seize them and slay them wherever you find them, and you take no one of them a friend or helper!
(Sura 4.89 - read more at [3]). The police found a note with an anti-Ayaan Hirsi Ali death threat on the corpse of a Muslim Murdered Dutch film director Theo van Gogh (with whom she had made a film critical of Islam). His deed itself was derived from the murderer of Sura 5.33:
(House of War) to consider and as home of the Kuffar (infidels) despise, but freedom rights as a fundamental basic component of a modern society and as an invitation to everyone here to consider living - as evidenced by the enormous potential to discover that holds a free society for the development of each individual. particularly impressive, I found the letters to the Ayaan Hirsi Ali receives from Muslims living in and Muslim women, such as the following [6, emphasis added]: A woman from Sudan, who lives in Virginia, sent me e-mail. "I thought as a Muslim woman it is my duty to hate your book, but then I read it and identified me with you Every feeling that you were looking to put into words in this book have also I have experienced. any intellectual conflict, fought out with you to I too have already felt ... I realize that I want to understand Islam and it just can not. What is Islam itself that it is for my parents and Pefekt so tempting, but seems to me so wrong? ... I condemn Islam not because I think he brings a certain truth in it - if I and would condemn him where I should go then? .
"
throws light on an intellectual fermentation and rethinking, which is no doubt that many Muslims living under way The highlighted point incidentally shows the situation of
extortion by the conditions
, which are home to the Muslim woman: Sun punishable as apostasy is in their social system, it would require a tremendous jolt to renounce Islam - because this step is to lose all the existing securities of life of the family, especially the children to be alienated and also ensure its very existence to have. As it is evident how little to rouse what they already with reason as a better way to detect .- many people had the stop of 11 September 2001 as to Ayaan Hirsi Ali as an eye opener about the true, undisguised nature of Islam, on its totality political core. Unfortunately, I must also have a different type of reaction talk: The bodies of the attack were not cold, because you already tried to take Islam as a prompter of these murders from the line of fire to conceal, play down, even the actors themselves as the victims. As it was said about: the U.S. was due ihrere foreign policy, for example, Israel and its Afghanistan policy, even guilty of that offense. One must understand the perpetrators who had been in need radical elements into the trap. Or, especially popular in Europe: The killings were a failed previous, not caring enough attributable implemented integration policies. These are but of fact, nothing but distortions of the actual conditions - Along the lines of
Not the murderer, but the murdered man's fault!
The apology from the offender, the concealment of the motives of these self-referred, the appeasement of formulas, the deviation from the actual conditions are psychologically understandable. They are explained by a mechanism described by the psychologists identification with the aggressor or as Stockholm Syndrome . The police know very well this behavior of hostage-takings. Americans remember the case of Patty Hearst
, a young girl from a wealthy family who was kidnapped in 1974 by a confused terrorist group. Over their hostage was it even to a convinced adherent of this group, and later led by robbery for them. By the mere experience of violence, it was reversed to some extent, took the position of their captors. The identification with the aggressor is not limited to hostage-taking, but is effective in all forms of violence by threatening or actually exercised, and, above all, it goes far beyond a merely extorted behavior. The desired behavior is performed not only reluctantly, but thrilled with all my heart and full Faszinition. Thanks to the mechanism of identification with the aggressor, the whole individuality to some extent conquered. This is just a special case, unfortunately general rule: Violence is sexy. constantly feel attracted to women convicted felons to write love letters to murderers, rapists and bank robbers. In German prisons of this psychological phenomenon in everyday life. [6] This is particularly true for young people and especially if the violence is associated with an opposition to the fundamental values of society. This means: It is the blood trail of Islam, which is associated with his practice violence, not only in the form of individual terrorist attacks but also as an institutionalized terror in countries like Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan, Iran, of a freedom-loving people in the West, the blood freezes in your veins, acts not only by the implicit threat by, anticipating freedom rights will be curtailed as soon as can be expected as a result of its exercise of Muslim terror, about moving beyond it is
make the effort, the 11th on behalf of Islam since the September terrorist attacks committed to document an ongoing basis. He is coming (February 2011) to the enormous number of 16,800 fatal attacks since 11 September 2001. This means that Islam called for a period of almost ten years
far more than ten times more deaths than the English Inquisition in all its 260th anniversary unfortunate history. [7] Anyone who doubts this number, may examine the statements of Robert Spencer, they underestimate I think rather the actual number of victims of Islamic terror. Given those numbers, you can not remember how to do it often, talk about confused individual perpetrators, from a handful of the mentally ill, but must face the fact that it is in these murders are related to a structural, Islam inherent phenomenon. Nor can it be said that the perpetrators interpret the Koran only wrong because the Koran contains calls to murder non-believers and dissenters leave scarcely any room for different interpretations. [8] One common obfuscation attempt it in the name of the Islam committed ugly practices are not due to Islam itself, but the so-called Islamists
. The Islamist is the worst, the movements of the peaceful religion of Islam itself in its opposite and make an instrument of death. Islam has nothing to do with these horrible things about anything, he was in truth the "religion of peace" (for which the similarity of the words
salam
, peace, and
islam , the self-subjection is used,). If true, it was just a matter of making the small group of "Islamists" pervert Islam, detect and destroy - a task that can easily to intelligence and security agencies may delegate, without its own personal use would be necessary. A nice solution. The problem is this: The separation of Islam and Islamism or Islamic fundamentalism "is an artificial one. keep self-Muslims and the Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tyyip Erdogan (which is in the West, ironically itself out as a "moderate Muslim") on the other hand [9]: The names [moderate Islam / Islamism, RP] are very ugly, it is offensive and an insult to our religion. There are no moderate or non-moderate Islam. Islam is Islam, and that's it ... Our religion is without fault.
In fact, fundamentalism is in itself not the problem but only that
is applied to the fundamentalism.
follows at this point most of the reference to the 1.6 billion Muslims, simply because of their high number but can not all be terrorists! This is undoubtedly true: There are Muslims who leave it to pursue the armed struggle against the infidels. There are Muslims who accept private for only parts of the Koran and the tradition. There are also Muslims, the Koran less familiar than the average critic of Islam - just as there are Christians who do not know what is actually being celebrated at Easter. There are Muslims who are only Muslim by birth and did not really care about their faith. There are Muslims, and conditions and only a few of their religious duties, practice their faith very lax. Thank God that way.
However the other way: why are all
suicide bombers, that we face today, the Muslim faith? If we the many, out of hatred, revenge and clan thinking atrocities by Muslims are lost as the acts of individual perpetrators are presented that the Koran only wrong understood them: Where are the suicide bombings, honor killings, genital mutilation, forced marriages of Buddhists, Christians, Baha'i, of atheists, who understood their beliefs wrong? Why is it almost exclusively among Muslims, the "confused individual perpetrators," the "The Faith-only false understanding"? This question remains with the explanations of the "confused individual offender" puzzling, even illogical.
Manfred Kleine-Hartlage has thoroughly declined reverse this once (my emphasis). Although the vast majority of Muslims are peaceful, that is undisputed - but [10]:
If a young woman on the open Street from her own brother is shot, one can safely bet large sums that both come from a Muslim family. If is cut through a hostage's throat in front of the camera, the offender will be Muslim. Those who are "German (English, Swedish) bitches" talk, is Muslim. Who is "more respect" demands for himself and his community is Muslim. Anyone who breaks and others with a dynamite belt in the air, such a murderer as "martyrs", explains the word "infidels" is used, his daughter can not learn to swim, she teaches instead that God commands the killing of Jews is Muslim. Countries where women raped be because of "adultery" thrown into prison are Muslim. Countries where the Bible may not be sold, but are probably the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion," Islamic. Countries where homosexuals are suspended from cranes are Islamic. Countries, is stoned in which are Islamic.
"Confused individual offenders" would occur under the laws of probability among all possible denominations. De facto, however, to focus the practices listed on Muslims. ME The only logical explanation is that these practices are derived from the teachings of Islam, and not from those of the Baha'is, Christians, Buddhists, etc. It is therefore something special about Islam, which distinguishes it from other denominations. This difference is to perceive it and to work out, instead of concealing it, or explained away.
is in the west but a political, practical interest in being explained away the difference of Islam from other religions and all beliefs are equal actual promotion. It does not hurt anyone if we could all religions as equal treatment, ignoring these differences, and one must not make the consequences that result just from the differences of religions. One should be clear: By looking away is it a lazy peace and also working on cementing the injustices with, is complicit. Rather, it is necessary to express the problematic issues clearly: Just can open the mind: Through honest, open dialogue. Might flow into tears, but no blood (Ayaan Hirsi Ali, [11]). Concealing unpleasant facts can not rely on the tolerance, but is strictly speaking nothing but cowardice: fear of the practical consequences that would derive from these unpleasant facts. The ideal of tolerance would require, in truth, just to look more closely. Tolerance has no blindfold on, but perceives the differences.
can also never practiced tolerance towards intolerance to be on pain of destruction. Tolerance can only work if the bare survival of the fittest is undermined if it can prevent the exercise of basic civil rights such as freedom of expression not by force or the mere threat of violence. This is not just since Sir Karl R. Popper The Open Society and Its Enemies "common property, but since the 18 Century, since the existence of modern, enlightened, democratic societies. [12] They could not have existed today without being shut out its external and internal enemies.
hear in conversations I often: Judaism and Christianity are still fundamentally similar to Islam. To believe West Europeans, who regard all cultures as essentially equivalent want and are prepared to ignore or deny painful differences with easily manageable arguments. Peace between religions, they do so eagerly, so they try to establish the fact that the facts before they threaten the peace or prevent this, close their eyes. The problem with the people from the West is not that they do not understand Islam. Your problem is that they do not understand Islam
complained already Wafa Sultan [13].
know Muslims themselves, however the essential difference of their religion to Christianity and Judaism very closely. In the 14th Century, more precisely, the Islamic scholars Ibn Khaldun (1332 - 1406) in his "Muqaddima" [14], Judaism is indeed able to assert itself politically in this world, but there was no universal right, vice versa have Christianity Although a universal claim, but he did not pursue the case with political and military means. Islam is superior to both religions, because it unites both: "In Islam, the Jihad (Holy War) is required by law, because it has a universal order and held that all of humanity voluntary or forced to convert to the religion of Islam".
Ibn Khaldun has hereby indicate a major difference between Islam to Christianity and Judaism, Islam demands that the whole world under its law, voluntary or forced
-, and of course: only forced, for a decision can not be free if it is accompanied by the threat of coercion. The Endperspektive is total Islamic rule:
And fight them so that no temptation can take place, and fight until all worship is for Allah alone. If any of them however on the disbelief, then, verily Allah doth see all that they do.
(Sura 8:39). This is obviously not a theological Proposition, but a concrete, very worldly to be taken to action. For this, the world of Muslims will be divided into two kingdoms: the Dar al-Islam , the house of Islam, where it's already the state religion and the Sharia applicable law, and the Dar al-Harb , the House of War, ie not from Islam dominated parts of the world. The rules of conduct for Muslims, it actually belongs, not to settle in the house of war. If they go into the house but the war, so is their job, there jihad (literally
effort - which includes not only acts of war, but all types of application for Islam) result, ie the Cause of Islam to help the victory. By these standards, Islam proves to be a totalitarian, after the global caliphate, that is striving for world domination ideology.
Ibn Khaldun acknowledges, however, quite in line with the Quran, that Jews know very well, think well and act on this side and their religion and to defend militarily. to make the universal claim as it entertains, Islam, their own religion to religion all over the world, is foreign to Judaism, however. One might add that there were also wars in history, the Jews by the Bible were commanded by God, such as the conquest against the Canaanites (Deuteronomy 20.16-18 and Jos 10:40). But these were temporally and spatially limited wars. The universal claim
missing - and this is an important distinction, as I saw Ibn Khaldun and from which he derived the superiority of Islam.
Christianity on the other hand does have the universal claim:
no resistance to evil (Matt. 5:39), unconditionally loved
their enemies (Matthew 5:44) and
not taught, so that they will not be judged
(Matt 7:1), could not last long in this world. The fundamental difference between Christianity and Islam is worked out in a "digression" by Manfred Kleine-Hartlage very beautiful. [15] Already the world and of man is fundamentally different. Islam affirms the world in the form in which it is found. For him, the believer is the way it is, an instrument of Allah. There is no fundamental criticism of this world. This world is God's creation, the whole world as given and Geselllschaftsordnung is part of God's will. This makes the extremely conservative Islam: At the time of Muhammad there was slavery, polygamy, female circumcision, Bedouin raids, clan and tyranny in place of guaranteed rights for all. Allah / Mohammed affirmed and legitimized this practice all that he has any objection to make, as long as it is exercised within the Umma, the Muslim community. Islam is the world set against affirmative. Although Islam also knows the world beyond the sky. But even this world is just by God in its basic structure by design, as it is. The Muslim can feel in this world as an extension of God. With the Koran, he has a divine guidance in hand, the simple terms and is not in need of interpretation. By Allah, the Muslim subjects (which is the literal meaning of "Islam"), it is part of the community of believers in this world, the
best of peoples, evolved for each person. Enjoining what is right, and you stop the injustice.
(Surah 3.110). He may therefore feel superior to its participation in the Ummah and the rest of humanity enjoys compared to the other two classes of people, the dhimmis and infidels, thanks to the Sharia Special rights (including the right to exercise authority over them).
Christianity is fundamentally different: the Christian suffering in the world and in it. For Christianity is the world as it is dropped out of the order of God. It is no longer in its original, holy, whole state - but sick. While everything points to her nor to the pure, unadulterated origin. But this source was lost by a kind of historical, universal human catastrophe: the "sin". The man knows only the longing for the "lost paradise", and the things of this world to remind him. But in its concrete form, they contain so much ungodly, so ungodly that an affirmative attitude to the world for the Christians is prohibited. The kingdom is not of this world (John 18:36), and all the wisdom of this world is foolishness before God (1 Cor. 1:20). Man has the following Christ a metaphysical perspective on the restoration of an original divine order, for Christ is the light (John 8:12) into light, which in this world in order to rise again in the willed by God order to let & ndash , and Christ, the new Adam
the first to go this route (Romans 5:12-15). The Christian can therefore never be completely absorbed in his actions in this world - It always remains a reserve. As a consequence, Christianity his whole being affirmed by the Säkularitätsprinzip, separating the secular from the divine order. For the Christian, is the already cited and fundamental principle: Give to Caesar what is Caesar's and unto God what is God's (Mark 12:13). Neither the rebellion against the social order to the better ordering sake [15a], or full integration into a social system can be a matter of the Christian. He lives in the world, but also relieved as spirits of the world. Party take a secular thing - this is something which he never fully absorbed can. Jesus, the Son of God and earthly at the same time human, united in the two orders. But shows his whole life, what preferences he was: he lived in the lower, little-respected social classes, and died - for love of the people - the shameful death on the cross, the death of a criminal - despite the fact that he never for violence call had. Since this Muslim world and understanding of religion is fundamentally opposed, denied Mohammed / Allah in Surah 4.157 the crucifixion of Jesus and instead depends on the Gnostic teachings, "another" was crucified instead of Jesus.
But now even the crucifixion of Jesus is one of the central elements of Christian faith, without even the prospect of a cure, the restored life in the resurrection would be unthinkable. The Bishop Melito of Sardis
- he lived in the 2nd Century, and the pagan mysteries were still popular - describes this "new mystery" [16]:
Nature shuddered and said, astonished What is this for a new mystery? The judge is directed and acts calm, The Invisible is seen and not afraid to The incomprehensible is detected and outraged not, The Unmeasurable is measured and not loath suffers the pain-free and does not avenge himself, The Immortal dies and refuses it. What is this for a new mystery?
If God, according to the Christians in the form of a disclosed in this world is absolutely powerless people, so can faith not be spread by force, but only on free decision of each individual are based. Man is by the decision of faith to the child of God, instead of being only one exporting slave of God's will: All who are led by the Spirit of God are sons of God. For you did not receive a spirit that makes you slaves, so that you had to always fear, but you have received the Spirit who makes you sons the spirit in which we cry Abba, Father! The Spirit itself bears witness with our spirit that we are children of God (Rom 8.14-15). This is the reason why the freedom is an important foundation of the Christian faith. The Church as well as secular institution, as mentioned, in a strained relationship with the radical non-political message of Jesus, for their protection tradition and they do actually. As a secular community, the church vulnerable, flawed, earthly and can of course also of Christians in the name of the Christian message to be attacked. How much temporal power must be exercised now and still can, to the Christian message and communion to save it from ruin, the result of a consistent realization of the central Christian doctrines would, was the subject of a protracted battle between religious and secular power. Thus the history of the church is also a history of religious divisions and schisms, which culminated in the Reformation as a temporary peak.
It is a common but incorrect view that the Enlightenment was a pure counter-movement to Christianity. On a superficial level that's right, because some scouts stood firmly against the church and Christianity, and undoubtedly there was strong opposition by the Church to the Enlightenment. But this is not critical. At its core are the basic values of the Enlightenment is nothing more than transformed , secularized Christian values . The Enlightenment can occur on any other ground than that of the Christian West. Values that lives a modern atheist or agnostic, are derived in part directly from Christian norms. Such directly from Christianity resulting standards include: the social element of turn to the weak that addressed ban that love commandment inclusive of enemies love and reflexive standards in the form of a
for all
people, not only for the members of the beliefs, current Golden Rule: all things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, that ye do them (Matt. 7:12) [17]
Whether we like it or not, whether we do. ourselves as Christians or not, the self-referential standards of Christianity, are passed over us in flesh and blood, we can no longer (or only with great effort) emerging from them. For example, current ideologies as cultural relativism is nothing but the internalized Christian Standard: Judge not, that ye be not judged (Matt. 7:1). The criticism of someone else or in a group, we do not belong to the causes the Westerners an inner pain. He is to be directed criticism at once put into perspective with self-criticism and what he wants to abandon the other, first of all and particularly strict abandon themselves. This is a great standard - but can only work as long as wall as the internalized compared to them. Someone who does not experience this standard, the radical criticism thrown back on itself as self-humiliation, as an admission of inferiority. In the case of Islam has thus reflecting our ongoing hesitation, our scrupulous adherence to the rule of law, the constant self-criticism, the loud denunciation even minor offenses against guaranteed fundamental rights, permitting radical critique for freedom's sake, the Expression of relentless misfeatures own, only in one sense: as Selbsteingeständnis the inferiority of our culture . Since this is fully compliant with the image that Islam stands anyway from the Judeo-Christian culture, so that Muslims encouraged to look to enter aggressively for their own culture, turn out exactly the standards with relativistic referring back to their implementation in the form of liberal social orders, the biggest achievement of mankind is, as the real Achilles heel of our entire Western civilization. [1] Wafa Sultan: In its crystal-clear, on Al-Jazeera broadcast
opinion which has since become a classic, she explains that the conflict is not, as Samuel P. Huntington says that a "clash of civilizations" is, for civilization, not fight they compete. Rather, we are witnessing a clash of civilization against barbarism.
[2] Ayaan Hirsi Ali, I am a nomad , Piper Verlag, Munich 2010, p. 13 For the derivation of violence and murder against unbelievers and footnotes [4] and [8].
[3] The Apostasy is the worst according to the Koran, what can a Muslim, and he will be cursed for it forever (Sura 4, 137). See also Sura 4.36 and Sura 16.106 ff and 9.68. An informative report on this, Christine Schirrmacher provides
http://www.igfm.de/Wenn-Muslime-Christen-werden-Glaubensabfall-und-Todesstrafe-im.466.0.html
[4] Also this quote Koran was found on the stapled to the victim list, see
http://widerworte.wordpress.com/2010/09/17/gewaltaufrufe-im-koran/
.
[5] André Glasmacher,
fear of punitive Islam
, Daily Mirror, 21.4.2007, http://www.tagesspiegel.de/berlin/angst-vor-dem-strafenden-islam/v_default, 837238.html
[ 5a] Bat Ye'or,
The decline of Eastern Christianity under Islam
, Resch Verlag, Gräfelfing 2005th
[6] Ayaan Hirsi Ali, supra, p. 277
[6] The fascination of the abominable
, image online by 14/04/2010.
[7] Robert Spencer, attacks in the name of Allah, since 11 September 2001 ,
http://therelegionofpeace.com
. Among the casualties of the English Inquisition, see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_Inquisition # Death_tolls
[8] It is sufficient if - as part of a division of labor - even a part of the Muslims for the concrete implementation the total of 206 Koran feels responsible that explicitly call for violence against unbelievers (a listing of these centers is given as the site http://www.koran.terror.ms/ ) - as long as they are not from the rest of the Ummah fights is clear, then created a climate of fear, appeasement and extortion, as it actually unfolds before our eyes. His "fatwa" of 1998 to justify terrorism against America, Bin Laden is based inter alia on Sure 9,5: "And when the sacred months have passed, slay the idolaters wherever you find them, an seize them and watched them from each ambush. " ( http://www.mideastweb.org/osamabinladen2.htm ). [9] Erdogan, quoted in the newspaper Milliyet, 21.8.2007. See http://www.politik.de/forum/religion/212757-ministerpraesident.html [10] Manfred Kleine-Hartlage, The Jihad system. How Islam works. P.9. [11] Ayaan Hirsi Ali, op cit, p. 268 [12] Karl R. Popper, The Open Society and Its enemies, two volumes, Francke Verlag, Tübingen 1980th [13] Wafa Sultan, interview in the Helen Glover Show vom 12.03.2009 .
[14] Ibn Khaldun,
Muqaddima . Quoted from http://koptisch.wordpress.com/2010/09/17/die-grunde-fur-die-christlichen-kreuzzuge/
[15] Manfred Kleine-Hartlage, supra Digression: Why Christianity with modernity compatible, but not of Islam, p.135-146. [15a] The overthrow of order, in which he lives is not for the Christians - but the struggle against injustice. For example, fought Christians in the first centuries AD, the slavery, because it is contrary to its principle of equality before God (as there was in Islam never had a significant resistance against slavery and was abolished in many Muslim countries, slavery only by the colonial masters) . See Egon Flaig, world history of slavery
, Beck Verlag, Munich 2009, p. 199ff.
[16] Melito of Sardis, quoted from
http://www.kathsurf.at/gebete/vorfahren/vorfahren.html # A new mystery [17] In contrast to Christianity, Islam knows not universal, Golden Rule valid for all people. The Koran is a golden rule is entirely absent. On the contrary, the division of people into higher-value (Muslims) and inferior (dhimmis, non-believers) a clear violation of the Golden Rule, which runs through the whole Koran and of course the Sharia, which proves to be right
of inequality . The Hadithstelle 1,2,13
can not cite as evidence to the contrary, for the (Saudi) translation leaves no doubt that this rule is limited to its own religious community, which currently lacks the essential criterion of universal applicability, that the Golden Usually makes up. The golden rule would be contrary to the Koran and the Islamic reality.
On 11 September 2001, I had a normal working day at SAP in Walldorf. On the way home I noticed the large, main entrance mounted monitor, were usually the broadcast SAP information and marketing movies. That evening he showed in a special broadcast the shocking pictures of the murders committed in the name of Allah. A cluster of colleagues had already formed about the head-shaking and visibly shocked watched the images. Also, I was stunned. For me, this day was a turning point and a cruel revelation. I felt like I was inside party. All differences that exist in the West, be it between conservatives and liberals, between Civil, socialists or communists, whether between Christians and Jews, agnostics and atheists, all these differences were suddenly insignificant, given the war of barbarism against civilization ( Wafa Sultan ) [1], which manifested itself here. All the imperfections and injustices of Western systems were small and insignificant in the face of this collapse of brute force. The Somali Ayaan Hirsi Ali was as shocked and stunned many in the West as grown men. She saw herself at that time as a Muslim herself. Again and again she read the arguments of Osama bin Laden, that justified these deeds. It examined the Koran and found that it was true, the Koran requires really killing infidels, it can indicate nothing about [2] Thus the decision was certain that she had to leave Islam back.. They, too, for this day was therefore a turning point. She wrote that she was not easy to break away from the fear of punishment in hell. Long after its rejection by the Muslim faith, she found herself in guilt before God. On the whole, their balance is positive - they could finally live in a civilized society, their desire for freedom. Even better, it would be natural if they do not under constant police protection should, as from the ranks of their former religious community they threaten her with murder - as any "apostate" (dramatizing for: Resigned) is under Islamic law of death: And if they turn back, then seize them and slay them wherever you find them, and you take no one of them a friend or helper!
(Sura 4.89 - read more at [3]). The police found a note with an anti-Ayaan Hirsi Ali death threat on the corpse of a Muslim Murdered Dutch film director Theo van Gogh (with whom she had made a film critical of Islam). His deed itself was derived from the murderer of Sura 5.33:
Behold, the wages of those who make war whom Allah and His Apostle and carry destruction to the earth, only that they killed or crucified, or alternately on the hands and feet be maimed or driven from the country. . It is here below their reward, and in the Hereafter will be a painful punishmentDar al-Harb
[4]
The death threat against people who break away from Islam, that is expressed not only against prominent critics of Islam such as Ayaan Hirsi Ali, she too is not an ancient Relic that is practiced only in some distant barbaric societies. We can protect ourselves with no excuses from the harsh fact that the death threat against "apostates" in the midst of our Western societies is alive and effective, as, for example, André glassmakers of living in Berlin, says converted to Christianity Iranians and Turks: These Christians must live counter to the government-guaranteed freedom of religion their faith in secret (like the early Christians of Rome, who met in the catacombs) to protect themselves from their former Muslim co-religionists. [5]
Ayaan Hirsi Ali's impressive book
I'm a nomad
[ 2] testifies of the life and freedom from thirst, a personality that has earned itself the Enlightenment values. Urgently appealing to the people in the West, not lightly abandon these values, to living under the Sharia people are usually out of reach - such as religious freedom (including the freedom to turn away from religion, in which one is born), the free expression, the principle of equal treatment before the law, to vote and stand for election. These are all truly valuable things, even if we assume the habit of not more often. Her book is also addressed as a stimulus to the Muslims living in the West, their problems she knows first hand. The main problem is therefore the
Inshallah
mentality ("God willing"): the lack of ownership. Instead of living with all the opportunities it offers to take active and to live their own freedom, there is a supply and victim mentality, it is maintained a comfortable general resentment, and the foreign freedoms be used for special rights for Muslims demand. Immigrants from Muslim countries do, according to Ayaan Hirsi Ali to create three main problems: money, sex and violence. In all three areas are now living on an anachronistic and often self-destructive way standards of countries of origin - often connected to a contempt of the host countries: It was and is common in the Islamic world, the "dhimmis", that look down Christians, Jews and Zoroastrians, as second class citizens, whose duties it is, for example, by high taxes, the Muslims a greater living standards to allow. [5] Ayaan Hirsi Ali calls on Muslims to separate themselves from this simple but hardcore mentality that the West no more than
(House of War) to consider and as home of the Kuffar (infidels) despise, but freedom rights as a fundamental basic component of a modern society and as an invitation to everyone here to consider living - as evidenced by the enormous potential to discover that holds a free society for the development of each individual. particularly impressive, I found the letters to the Ayaan Hirsi Ali receives from Muslims living in and Muslim women, such as the following [6, emphasis added]: A woman from Sudan, who lives in Virginia, sent me e-mail. "I thought as a Muslim woman it is my duty to hate your book, but then I read it and identified me with you Every feeling that you were looking to put into words in this book have also I have experienced. any intellectual conflict, fought out with you to I too have already felt ... I realize that I want to understand Islam and it just can not. What is Islam itself that it is for my parents and Pefekt so tempting, but seems to me so wrong? ... I condemn Islam not because I think he brings a certain truth in it - if I and would condemn him where I should go then? .
"
throws light on an intellectual fermentation and rethinking, which is no doubt that many Muslims living under way The highlighted point incidentally shows the situation of
extortion by the conditions
, which are home to the Muslim woman: Sun punishable as apostasy is in their social system, it would require a tremendous jolt to renounce Islam - because this step is to lose all the existing securities of life of the family, especially the children to be alienated and also ensure its very existence to have. As it is evident how little to rouse what they already with reason as a better way to detect .- many people had the stop of 11 September 2001 as to Ayaan Hirsi Ali as an eye opener about the true, undisguised nature of Islam, on its totality political core. Unfortunately, I must also have a different type of reaction talk: The bodies of the attack were not cold, because you already tried to take Islam as a prompter of these murders from the line of fire to conceal, play down, even the actors themselves as the victims. As it was said about: the U.S. was due ihrere foreign policy, for example, Israel and its Afghanistan policy, even guilty of that offense. One must understand the perpetrators who had been in need radical elements into the trap. Or, especially popular in Europe: The killings were a failed previous, not caring enough attributable implemented integration policies. These are but of fact, nothing but distortions of the actual conditions - Along the lines of
Not the murderer, but the murdered man's fault!
The apology from the offender, the concealment of the motives of these self-referred, the appeasement of formulas, the deviation from the actual conditions are psychologically understandable. They are explained by a mechanism described by the psychologists identification with the aggressor or as Stockholm Syndrome . The police know very well this behavior of hostage-takings. Americans remember the case of Patty Hearst
, a young girl from a wealthy family who was kidnapped in 1974 by a confused terrorist group. Over their hostage was it even to a convinced adherent of this group, and later led by robbery for them. By the mere experience of violence, it was reversed to some extent, took the position of their captors. The identification with the aggressor is not limited to hostage-taking, but is effective in all forms of violence by threatening or actually exercised, and, above all, it goes far beyond a merely extorted behavior. The desired behavior is performed not only reluctantly, but thrilled with all my heart and full Faszinition. Thanks to the mechanism of identification with the aggressor, the whole individuality to some extent conquered. This is just a special case, unfortunately general rule: Violence is sexy. constantly feel attracted to women convicted felons to write love letters to murderers, rapists and bank robbers. In German prisons of this psychological phenomenon in everyday life. [6] This is particularly true for young people and especially if the violence is associated with an opposition to the fundamental values of society. This means: It is the blood trail of Islam, which is associated with his practice violence, not only in the form of individual terrorist attacks but also as an institutionalized terror in countries like Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan, Iran, of a freedom-loving people in the West, the blood freezes in your veins, acts not only by the implicit threat by, anticipating freedom rights will be curtailed as soon as can be expected as a result of its exercise of Muslim terror, about moving beyond it is
just the violence 
that Islam for many Westerners attractive. Many young people who convert to Islam in the West today is that flower but a rude awakening. Because of the way back is blocked: the conversion to the next fashion religion in some years the death penalty! The convert to Islam are facing a similar hard landing as the western women who are in have a relationship with a Muslim go and their harrowing stories on the website of the Forum
Bezness were collected. The American Islam critic Robert Spencer that Islam for many Westerners attractive. Many young people who convert to Islam in the West today is that flower but a rude awakening. Because of the way back is blocked: the conversion to the next fashion religion in some years the death penalty! The convert to Islam are facing a similar hard landing as the western women who are in have a relationship with a Muslim go and their harrowing stories on the website of the Forum make the effort, the 11th on behalf of Islam since the September terrorist attacks committed to document an ongoing basis. He is coming (February 2011) to the enormous number of 16,800 fatal attacks since 11 September 2001. This means that Islam called for a period of almost ten years
far more than ten times more deaths than the English Inquisition in all its 260th anniversary unfortunate history. [7] Anyone who doubts this number, may examine the statements of Robert Spencer, they underestimate I think rather the actual number of victims of Islamic terror. Given those numbers, you can not remember how to do it often, talk about confused individual perpetrators, from a handful of the mentally ill, but must face the fact that it is in these murders are related to a structural, Islam inherent phenomenon. Nor can it be said that the perpetrators interpret the Koran only wrong because the Koran contains calls to murder non-believers and dissenters leave scarcely any room for different interpretations. [8] One common obfuscation attempt it in the name of the Islam committed ugly practices are not due to Islam itself, but the so-called Islamists
. The Islamist is the worst, the movements of the peaceful religion of Islam itself in its opposite and make an instrument of death. Islam has nothing to do with these horrible things about anything, he was in truth the "religion of peace" (for which the similarity of the words
salam
, peace, and
islam , the self-subjection is used,). If true, it was just a matter of making the small group of "Islamists" pervert Islam, detect and destroy - a task that can easily to intelligence and security agencies may delegate, without its own personal use would be necessary. A nice solution. The problem is this: The separation of Islam and Islamism or Islamic fundamentalism "is an artificial one. keep self-Muslims and the Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tyyip Erdogan (which is in the West, ironically itself out as a "moderate Muslim") on the other hand [9]: The names [moderate Islam / Islamism, RP] are very ugly, it is offensive and an insult to our religion. There are no moderate or non-moderate Islam. Islam is Islam, and that's it ... Our religion is without fault.
In fact, fundamentalism is in itself not the problem but only that
is applied to the fundamentalism.
A fundamentalist is merely someone who takes his faith very seriously, it uses pretty strong and would have no other criterion considered his faith. The fundamentalist is therefore not dangerous in itself: It is important to what he believes! A fundamentalist Buddhist may retreat to the mountains and radical in search of enlightenment. A danger to society is not safe from it. A fundamentalist Muslim contrast, seeks to enlarge the "house of Islam" and the religious Struggle (jihad) to kill as many infidels. The problem therefore is not fundamentalism per se, but in its reference object - in this case: Islam itself is revealed by the people who take seriously the Islam, because they bring the contents of their religion most clearly expressed.
follows at this point most of the reference to the 1.6 billion Muslims, simply because of their high number but can not all be terrorists! This is undoubtedly true: There are Muslims who leave it to pursue the armed struggle against the infidels. There are Muslims who accept private for only parts of the Koran and the tradition. There are also Muslims, the Koran less familiar than the average critic of Islam - just as there are Christians who do not know what is actually being celebrated at Easter. There are Muslims who are only Muslim by birth and did not really care about their faith. There are Muslims, and conditions and only a few of their religious duties, practice their faith very lax. Thank God that way.
However the other way: why are all
suicide bombers, that we face today, the Muslim faith? If we the many, out of hatred, revenge and clan thinking atrocities by Muslims are lost as the acts of individual perpetrators are presented that the Koran only wrong understood them: Where are the suicide bombings, honor killings, genital mutilation, forced marriages of Buddhists, Christians, Baha'i, of atheists, who understood their beliefs wrong? Why is it almost exclusively among Muslims, the "confused individual perpetrators," the "The Faith-only false understanding"? This question remains with the explanations of the "confused individual offender" puzzling, even illogical.
Manfred Kleine-Hartlage has thoroughly declined reverse this once (my emphasis). Although the vast majority of Muslims are peaceful, that is undisputed - but [10]:
If a young woman on the open Street from her own brother is shot, one can safely bet large sums that both come from a Muslim family. If is cut through a hostage's throat in front of the camera, the offender will be Muslim. Those who are "German (English, Swedish) bitches" talk, is Muslim. Who is "more respect" demands for himself and his community is Muslim. Anyone who breaks and others with a dynamite belt in the air, such a murderer as "martyrs", explains the word "infidels" is used, his daughter can not learn to swim, she teaches instead that God commands the killing of Jews is Muslim. Countries where women raped be because of "adultery" thrown into prison are Muslim. Countries where the Bible may not be sold, but are probably the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion," Islamic. Countries where homosexuals are suspended from cranes are Islamic. Countries, is stoned in which are Islamic.
"Confused individual offenders" would occur under the laws of probability among all possible denominations. De facto, however, to focus the practices listed on Muslims. ME The only logical explanation is that these practices are derived from the teachings of Islam, and not from those of the Baha'is, Christians, Buddhists, etc. It is therefore something special about Islam, which distinguishes it from other denominations. This difference is to perceive it and to work out, instead of concealing it, or explained away.
is in the west but a political, practical interest in being explained away the difference of Islam from other religions and all beliefs are equal actual promotion. It does not hurt anyone if we could all religions as equal treatment, ignoring these differences, and one must not make the consequences that result just from the differences of religions. One should be clear: By looking away is it a lazy peace and also working on cementing the injustices with, is complicit. Rather, it is necessary to express the problematic issues clearly: Just can open the mind: Through honest, open dialogue. Might flow into tears, but no blood (Ayaan Hirsi Ali, [11]). Concealing unpleasant facts can not rely on the tolerance, but is strictly speaking nothing but cowardice: fear of the practical consequences that would derive from these unpleasant facts. The ideal of tolerance would require, in truth, just to look more closely. Tolerance has no blindfold on, but perceives the differences.
can also never practiced tolerance towards intolerance to be on pain of destruction. Tolerance can only work if the bare survival of the fittest is undermined if it can prevent the exercise of basic civil rights such as freedom of expression not by force or the mere threat of violence. This is not just since Sir Karl R. Popper The Open Society and Its Enemies "common property, but since the 18 Century, since the existence of modern, enlightened, democratic societies. [12] They could not have existed today without being shut out its external and internal enemies.
hear in conversations I often: Judaism and Christianity are still fundamentally similar to Islam. To believe West Europeans, who regard all cultures as essentially equivalent want and are prepared to ignore or deny painful differences with easily manageable arguments. Peace between religions, they do so eagerly, so they try to establish the fact that the facts before they threaten the peace or prevent this, close their eyes. The problem with the people from the West is not that they do not understand Islam. Your problem is that they do not understand Islam
complained already Wafa Sultan [13].
know Muslims themselves, however the essential difference of their religion to Christianity and Judaism very closely. In the 14th Century, more precisely, the Islamic scholars Ibn Khaldun (1332 - 1406) in his "Muqaddima" [14], Judaism is indeed able to assert itself politically in this world, but there was no universal right, vice versa have Christianity Although a universal claim, but he did not pursue the case with political and military means. Islam is superior to both religions, because it unites both: "In Islam, the Jihad (Holy War) is required by law, because it has a universal order and held that all of humanity voluntary or forced to convert to the religion of Islam".
Ibn Khaldun has hereby indicate a major difference between Islam to Christianity and Judaism, Islam demands that the whole world under its law, voluntary or forced
-, and of course: only
And fight them so that no temptation can take place, and fight until all worship is for Allah alone. If any of them however on the disbelief, then, verily Allah doth see all that they do.
(Sura 8:39). This is obviously not a theological Proposition, but a concrete, very worldly to be taken to action. For this, the world of Muslims will be divided into two kingdoms: the Dar al-Islam , the house of Islam, where it's already the state religion and the Sharia applicable law, and the Dar al-Harb , the House of War, ie not from Islam dominated parts of the world. The rules of conduct for Muslims, it actually belongs, not to settle in the house of war. If they go into the house but the war, so is their job, there jihad (literally
effort - which includes not only acts of war, but all types of application for Islam) result, ie the Cause of Islam to help the victory. By these standards, Islam proves to be a totalitarian, after the global caliphate, that is striving for world domination ideology.
Ibn Khaldun acknowledges, however, quite in line with the Quran, that Jews know very well, think well and act on this side and their religion and to defend militarily. to make the universal claim as it entertains, Islam, their own religion to religion all over the world, is foreign to Judaism, however. One might add that there were also wars in history, the Jews by the Bible were commanded by God, such as the conquest against the Canaanites (Deuteronomy 20.16-18 and Jos 10:40). But these were temporally and spatially limited wars. The universal claim
missing - and this is an important distinction, as I saw Ibn Khaldun and from which he derived the superiority of Islam.
Christianity on the other hand does have the universal claim:
Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit! Teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you! And surely I am with you always, even to the end. (Mt 28:19-20). But it is a claim of the mission of preaching. Ibn Khaldun really know that Christianity is not commanded, this claim with political and military to track products . Christianity separates namely the temporal and spiritual things: therefore unto Caesar what is Caesar's and unto God what is God's
(Matt. 22:21), and just the essence of the Christian doctrine has no concrete worldly implications, but concerns humans as spiritual beings and a transcendent, though in this world into glowing Procedure (the "kingdom of God" or heaven). Christianity as a religion but would not survive if the community of believers in Christ, The Church, therefore, had not formed and secular, would become an institution in the world. This institution is in a permanent tension to the Embassy, for their protection, preservation and dissemination of it is taken up. This can not be otherwise, for an institution that provided no resistance to evil (Matt. 5:39), unconditionally loved
their enemies (Matthew 5:44) and
not taught, so that they will not be judged
(Matt 7:1), could not last long in this world. The fundamental difference between Christianity and Islam is worked out in a "digression" by Manfred Kleine-Hartlage very beautiful. [15] Already the world and of man is fundamentally different. Islam affirms the world in the form in which it is found. For him, the believer is the way it is, an instrument of Allah. There is no fundamental criticism of this world. This world is God's creation, the whole world as given and Geselllschaftsordnung is part of God's will. This makes the extremely conservative Islam: At the time of Muhammad there was slavery, polygamy, female circumcision, Bedouin raids, clan and tyranny in place of guaranteed rights for all. Allah / Mohammed affirmed and legitimized this practice all that he has any objection to make, as long as it is exercised within the Umma, the Muslim community. Islam is the world set against affirmative. Although Islam also knows the world beyond the sky. But even this world is just by God in its basic structure by design, as it is. The Muslim can feel in this world as an extension of God. With the Koran, he has a divine guidance in hand, the simple terms and is not in need of interpretation. By Allah, the Muslim subjects (which is the literal meaning of "Islam"), it is part of the community of believers in this world, the
best of peoples, evolved for each person. Enjoining what is right, and you stop the injustice.
(Surah 3.110). He may therefore feel superior to its participation in the Ummah and the rest of humanity enjoys compared to the other two classes of people, the dhimmis and infidels, thanks to the Sharia Special rights (including the right to exercise authority over them).
Christianity is fundamentally different: the Christian suffering in the world and in it. For Christianity is the world as it is dropped out of the order of God. It is no longer in its original, holy, whole state - but sick. While everything points to her nor to the pure, unadulterated origin. But this source was lost by a kind of historical, universal human catastrophe: the "sin". The man knows only the longing for the "lost paradise", and the things of this world to remind him. But in its concrete form, they contain so much ungodly, so ungodly that an affirmative attitude to the world for the Christians is prohibited. The kingdom is not of this world (John 18:36), and all the wisdom of this world is foolishness before God (1 Cor. 1:20). Man has the following Christ a metaphysical perspective on the restoration of an original divine order, for Christ is the light (John 8:12) into light, which in this world in order to rise again in the willed by God order to let & ndash , and Christ, the new Adam
the first to go this route (Romans 5:12-15). The Christian can therefore never be completely absorbed in his actions in this world - It always remains a reserve. As a consequence, Christianity his whole being affirmed by the Säkularitätsprinzip, separating the secular from the divine order. For the Christian, is the already cited and fundamental principle: Give to Caesar what is Caesar's and unto God what is God's (Mark 12:13). Neither the rebellion against the social order to the better ordering sake [15a], or full integration into a social system can be a matter of the Christian. He lives in the world, but also relieved as spirits of the world. Party take a secular thing - this is something which he never fully absorbed can. Jesus, the Son of God and earthly at the same time human, united in the two orders. But shows his whole life, what preferences he was: he lived in the lower, little-respected social classes, and died - for love of the people - the shameful death on the cross, the death of a criminal - despite the fact that he never for violence call had. Since this Muslim world and understanding of religion is fundamentally opposed, denied Mohammed / Allah in Surah 4.157 the crucifixion of Jesus and instead depends on the Gnostic teachings, "another" was crucified instead of Jesus.
But now even the crucifixion of Jesus is one of the central elements of Christian faith, without even the prospect of a cure, the restored life in the resurrection would be unthinkable. The Bishop Melito of Sardis
- he lived in the 2nd Century, and the pagan mysteries were still popular - describes this "new mystery" [16]:
Nature shuddered and said, astonished What is this for a new mystery? The judge is directed and acts calm, The Invisible is seen and not afraid to The incomprehensible is detected and outraged not, The Unmeasurable is measured and not loath suffers the pain-free and does not avenge himself, The Immortal dies and refuses it. What is this for a new mystery?
If God, according to the Christians in the form of a disclosed in this world is absolutely powerless people, so can faith not be spread by force, but only on free decision of each individual are based. Man is by the decision of faith to the child of God, instead of being only one exporting slave of God's will: All who are led by the Spirit of God are sons of God. For you did not receive a spirit that makes you slaves, so that you had to always fear, but you have received the Spirit who makes you sons the spirit in which we cry Abba, Father! The Spirit itself bears witness with our spirit that we are children of God (Rom 8.14-15). This is the reason why the freedom is an important foundation of the Christian faith. The Church as well as secular institution, as mentioned, in a strained relationship with the radical non-political message of Jesus, for their protection tradition and they do actually. As a secular community, the church vulnerable, flawed, earthly and can of course also of Christians in the name of the Christian message to be attacked. How much temporal power must be exercised now and still can, to the Christian message and communion to save it from ruin, the result of a consistent realization of the central Christian doctrines would, was the subject of a protracted battle between religious and secular power. Thus the history of the church is also a history of religious divisions and schisms, which culminated in the Reformation as a temporary peak.
It is a common but incorrect view that the Enlightenment was a pure counter-movement to Christianity. On a superficial level that's right, because some scouts stood firmly against the church and Christianity, and undoubtedly there was strong opposition by the Church to the Enlightenment. But this is not critical. At its core are the basic values of the Enlightenment is nothing more than transformed , secularized Christian values . The Enlightenment can occur on any other ground than that of the Christian West. Values that lives a modern atheist or agnostic, are derived in part directly from Christian norms. Such directly from Christianity resulting standards include: the social element of turn to the weak that addressed ban that love commandment inclusive of enemies love and reflexive standards in the form of a
for all
people, not only for the members of the beliefs, current Golden Rule: all things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, that ye do them (Matt. 7:12) [17]
Whether we like it or not, whether we do. ourselves as Christians or not, the self-referential standards of Christianity, are passed over us in flesh and blood, we can no longer (or only with great effort) emerging from them. For example, current ideologies as cultural relativism is nothing but the internalized Christian Standard: Judge not, that ye be not judged (Matt. 7:1). The criticism of someone else or in a group, we do not belong to the causes the Westerners an inner pain. He is to be directed criticism at once put into perspective with self-criticism and what he wants to abandon the other, first of all and particularly strict abandon themselves. This is a great standard - but can only work as long as wall as the internalized compared to them. Someone who does not experience this standard, the radical criticism thrown back on itself as self-humiliation, as an admission of inferiority. In the case of Islam has thus reflecting our ongoing hesitation, our scrupulous adherence to the rule of law, the constant self-criticism, the loud denunciation even minor offenses against guaranteed fundamental rights, permitting radical critique for freedom's sake, the Expression of relentless misfeatures own, only in one sense: as Selbsteingeständnis the inferiority of our culture . Since this is fully compliant with the image that Islam stands anyway from the Judeo-Christian culture, so that Muslims encouraged to look to enter aggressively for their own culture, turn out exactly the standards with relativistic referring back to their implementation in the form of liberal social orders, the biggest achievement of mankind is, as the real Achilles heel of our entire Western civilization. [1] Wafa Sultan: In its crystal-clear, on Al-Jazeera broadcast
opinion which has since become a classic, she explains that the conflict is not, as Samuel P. Huntington says that a "clash of civilizations" is, for civilization, not fight they compete. Rather, we are witnessing a clash of civilization against barbarism.
[2] Ayaan Hirsi Ali, I am a nomad , Piper Verlag, Munich 2010, p. 13 For the derivation of violence and murder against unbelievers and footnotes [4] and [8].
[3] The Apostasy is the worst according to the Koran, what can a Muslim, and he will be cursed for it forever (Sura 4, 137). See also Sura 4.36 and Sura 16.106 ff and 9.68. An informative report on this, Christine Schirrmacher provides
http://www.igfm.de/Wenn-Muslime-Christen-werden-Glaubensabfall-und-Todesstrafe-im.466.0.html
[4] Also this quote Koran was found on the stapled to the victim list, see
http://widerworte.wordpress.com/2010/09/17/gewaltaufrufe-im-koran/
.
[5] André Glasmacher,
fear of punitive Islam
, Daily Mirror, 21.4.2007, http://www.tagesspiegel.de/berlin/angst-vor-dem-strafenden-islam/v_default, 837238.html
[ 5a] Bat Ye'or,
The decline of Eastern Christianity under Islam
, Resch Verlag, Gräfelfing 2005th
[6] Ayaan Hirsi Ali, supra, p. 277
[6]
, image online by 14/04/2010.
[7] Robert Spencer, attacks in the name of Allah, since 11 September 2001 ,
http://therelegionofpeace.com
. Among the casualties of the English Inquisition, see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_Inquisition # Death_tolls
[8] It is sufficient if - as part of a division of labor - even a part of the Muslims for the concrete implementation the total of 206 Koran feels responsible that explicitly call for violence against unbelievers (a listing of these centers is given as the site http://www.koran.terror.ms/ ) - as long as they are not from the rest of the Ummah fights is clear, then created a climate of fear, appeasement and extortion, as it actually unfolds before our eyes. His "fatwa" of 1998 to justify terrorism against America, Bin Laden is based inter alia on Sure 9,5: "And when the sacred months have passed, slay the idolaters wherever you find them, an seize them and watched them from each ambush. " ( http://www.mideastweb.org/osamabinladen2.htm ). [9] Erdogan, quoted in the newspaper Milliyet, 21.8.2007. See http://www.politik.de/forum/religion/212757-ministerpraesident.html [10] Manfred Kleine-Hartlage, The Jihad system. How Islam works. P.9. [11] Ayaan Hirsi Ali, op cit, p. 268 [12] Karl R. Popper, The Open Society and Its enemies, two volumes, Francke Verlag, Tübingen 1980th [13] Wafa Sultan, interview in the Helen Glover Show vom 12.03.2009 .
[14] Ibn Khaldun,
Muqaddima . Quoted from http://koptisch.wordpress.com/2010/09/17/die-grunde-fur-die-christlichen-kreuzzuge/
[15] Manfred Kleine-Hartlage, supra Digression: Why Christianity with modernity compatible, but not of Islam, p.135-146. [15a] The overthrow of order, in which he lives is not for the Christians - but the struggle against injustice. For example, fought Christians in the first centuries AD, the slavery, because it is contrary to its principle of equality before God (as there was in Islam never had a significant resistance against slavery and was abolished in many Muslim countries, slavery only by the colonial masters) . See Egon Flaig, world history of slavery
, Beck Verlag, Munich 2009, p. 199ff.
[16] Melito of Sardis, quoted from
http://www.kathsurf.at/gebete/vorfahren/vorfahren.html # A new mystery [17] In contrast to Christianity, Islam knows not universal, Golden Rule valid for all people. The Koran is a golden rule is entirely absent. On the contrary, the division of people into higher-value (Muslims) and inferior (dhimmis, non-believers) a clear violation of the Golden Rule, which runs through the whole Koran and of course the Sharia, which proves to be right
of inequality . The Hadithstelle 1,2,13
can not cite as evidence to the contrary, for the (Saudi) translation leaves no doubt that this rule is limited to its own religious community, which currently lacks the essential criterion of universal applicability, that the Golden Usually makes up. The golden rule would be contrary to the Koran and the Islamic reality.
Friday, February 11, 2011
Female Genital Gouty Tophi
Mohammed A study of Johannes Kepler
In a small, 1604 published writing Judicium Kepleri de prognóstico P. Sutorii deals of the imperial court mathematician and astronomer Johannes Kepler
with an investigation of the astrologer Paul Sutorius of Mohammed and the future of Islam. This had forecast, according to Kepler, the Christians are subjected in the years 1604-1644 very serious confusions, which served as a punishment for their sins stubborn
[1] to be considered. The font of Sutorius culminated in the prediction that for the year 1700 the true of all Christians eagerly awaited final return of our heavenly King and Savior Jesus Christ is near, near and hereby take this world will come to an end. [1] Kepler increases of writing from Sutorius position and discusses its astrological, political and historical arguments in great detail.
For astrologers, it is an interesting question, which charts were then based on a study of Islam - because its visitations to this is when the prophesied terrible confusions .
Since Muhammad was not of royal lineage, his exact birth dates were unknown. It also appears in Islam no source given to those in a kind of unequivocal, official birth time was informed (but there was one, given the Quran abandoned timetable with a date of birth, which he calls chronicum ad Alcoranum ). Kepler concludes: wants Mercator, he was born Anno Christi 569, Chronicum ad Alcoranum 571, 21 Sept., alii 596th 23. April, Sutorius 594, 23 April.
Kepler finds the birth year 594 implausible. Because that Mohammed would be the time of the Hegira was only 28 years old - too young for a venture that the Council was in the closet than in sheer audacity. Kepler knew about the Hegira as a safe date:
For certain, that he anno 622, when he preached for a long time ago had, had to flee and in such of his flight is raised to the secular head. Later this: He has no doubt been many years earlier with his teaching, for which a right age is necessary to be moved about until it is so much danger and hostility had loaded on his neck that he had to escape.
He is now on the interpretation of the horoscope by Sutorius, and he misses no opportunity, the Wheel of Fortune ( pars fortunae ) as a fictitious point to explain where you have to attach as all Arab points of no importance.
In Mohammed Horoscope for Sutorius is the moon elevates and is in the fish in his exaltation, is therefore a substantial risk. It forms a sextile to Mercury / Venus conjunction and in opposition to Mars. For this purpose, Kepler writes, that the mixing Mercurii et Veneri in sextili Lunae prone to all sorts of pleasure. Which probably refers to the Mahomet teaching rhymes, which allows polygamy, and because it is known from history that Kepler has gone through marriage is to cite the experience of phrase: when the moon is made noble and of many planets with aspects is irradiated, as Here, it means noble and rich marriage.
Although he is the chart of Sutorius many points for matching, he rejects it because of the birth date in his view was too late. He keeps a dear Chronicon arabic
that the Koran is attached and the birth date 21 September 571 indicates noon. Since then he the moon with 10 ° Aries indicates he must have miscalculated by one day, because there the moon was on 20 September. To the comprehensibility of the text here follows the birth figure for 20 September 571:
The following is an interpretation that Kepler (as so often)
prescribed in the rules of the astrologers
not his own are:
No doubt this figure Roeslin Sutorius and ignored because it has not been good for them, but: According astrological teaching is not particularly important here, and Jupiter and Mars in opposite sign, Mars is discarded eighth house, Jupiter is in decline, with Fortune Dragon's Tail in the opposite domicile of Saturn [in Aquarius], that even in his case [ie in lion], the square of the Midheaven. That would be bad meanings. But they also found some things that would have been praise: Jupiter is in his home, in trine to the MC, sun and moon in front, the moon with a dragon head, Regulus and Venus, so that here too the moon again fits admirably. Moreover, the Midheaven at the site of the great conjunction of the years 571 and 630 [ie at the beginning of the scorpion.] Also, the Jupiter, which illuminates the place of the Great Conjunction of 631 cheap [from the fish], while the sun in the third of the watermark is [the cancer]. Because the Midheaven means the rule, these could be subsumed constellation the Great Conjunctions, supporting the argument Roeslin further, the aqueous Trigon would favor the Muslims. But the fire he can not reject [the Muslims consider as irrelevant], because the moon is in it so admirably well. The ruling in this realm polygamy would be a good match for this position of the moon, Venus and Mercury because again mingle with him. Mars as ruler of the Ascendant [by increasing] and of the Midheaven [of domicile], sextile to the Sun and trine the Ascendant means of war, militant rulers in the house of Mercury [Virgin] fraudulent and false. Jupiter, ruler of the sun and moon [ie via Dean?], Means for religious matters derived honor and dominion, and that king and priest is a person. Saturn moon nodes between the lights [also here in the short distance between the Sun and Moon] is tyrannical ruler and destroyer, for strong police and order. All this I have
derived according to the teachings of the astrologers, to show that it Sutorius would not have needed to be in new, inappropriate way from the nativity Mohammed directorates calculate, instead, how teach the astrologers, the horoscopes of the Enthronement be used for the directorates, which will affect the kingdom more than the personal horoscope Mohammed.
probably listed here horoscopes are constructed of Mohammed. The Arabs were the powerful and astrology should their Prophet to an astrologically right time can connect to the world. It is different to the Hegira: Because actually the Hegira began a new time counting, this date is probably correct. The horoscope is also used elsewhere in the astrological literature. [3] proceeds Whether the history of Islam really in concordance with the Directorates of this chart would be to study again. The repeatedly emphasized the context with the mutation of the great conjunctions into the water element (conjunction of 29.8.571 jul. to 3 ° 31 'Scorpio) is certainly worth considering. Also interesting is the allocation of the water element of the fire element to Islam and to Christianity (because the life of Jesus began with the mutation in the fire element) in which Kepler matches apparently Roeslin and Sutorius. [1] Kepler, Judicium de Prognostici Sutorii P. (1604), in: Opera Omnia, ed C. Frisch, Book VIII, p. 302 See http://books.google.de/ebooks/reader?id=-pcqAAAAYAAJ&printsec=frontcover&output=reader
, the report begins on page 300th All the text following quotes are from this report Kepler. The Words I partly transferred to the better understanding in today's German. Comments in square brackets are added by me.
[2] Kepler finds some of these constellations related to those of his present Luther horoscope for the 10th November 1483, 11 Hour - and noted at this point that there is a dispute over the correct date of birth of Luther. [3] Thus, in José Luis San Miguel de Pablos, Uranus-Neptune conjunctions
, publishing here and now, Hamburg 1993, p. 35 He is concerned with the Uranus-Neptune conjunction of 18.9.623 jul. Which begins to take shape in the Hegira chart already.
In a small, 1604 published writing Judicium Kepleri de prognóstico P. Sutorii deals of the imperial court mathematician and astronomer Johannes Kepler
with an investigation of the astrologer Paul Sutorius of Mohammed and the future of Islam. This had forecast, according to Kepler, the Christians are subjected in the years 1604-1644 very serious confusions, which served as a punishment for their sins stubborn
[1] to be considered. The font of Sutorius culminated in the prediction that for the year 1700 the true of all Christians eagerly awaited final return of our heavenly King and Savior Jesus Christ is near, near and hereby take this world will come to an end. [1] Kepler increases of writing from Sutorius position and discusses its astrological, political and historical arguments in great detail.
For astrologers, it is an interesting question, which charts were then based on a study of Islam - because its visitations to this is when the prophesied terrible confusions .
Since Muhammad was not of royal lineage, his exact birth dates were unknown. It also appears in Islam no source given to those in a kind of unequivocal, official birth time was informed (but there was one, given the Quran abandoned timetable with a date of birth, which he calls chronicum ad Alcoranum ). Kepler concludes: wants Mercator, he was born Anno Christi 569, Chronicum ad Alcoranum 571, 21 Sept., alii 596th 23. April, Sutorius 594, 23 April.
Kepler finds the birth year 594 implausible. Because that Mohammed would be the time of the Hegira was only 28 years old - too young for a venture that the Council was in the closet than in sheer audacity. Kepler knew about the Hegira as a safe date:
For certain, that he anno 622, when he preached for a long time ago had, had to flee and in such of his flight is raised to the secular head. Later this: He has no doubt been many years earlier with his teaching, for which a right age is necessary to be moved about until it is so much danger and hostility had loaded on his neck that he had to escape.
He is now on the interpretation of the horoscope by Sutorius, and he misses no opportunity, the Wheel of Fortune ( pars fortunae ) as a fictitious point to explain where you have to attach as all Arab points of no importance.
In Mohammed Horoscope for Sutorius is the moon elevates and is in the fish in his exaltation, is therefore a substantial risk. It forms a sextile to Mercury / Venus conjunction and in opposition to Mars. For this purpose, Kepler writes, that the mixing Mercurii et Veneri in sextili Lunae prone to all sorts of pleasure. Which probably refers to the Mahomet teaching rhymes, which allows polygamy, and because it is known from history that Kepler has gone through marriage is to cite the experience of phrase: when the moon is made noble and of many planets with aspects is irradiated, as Here, it means noble and rich marriage.
Although he is the chart of Sutorius many points for matching, he rejects it because of the birth date in his view was too late. He keeps a dear Chronicon arabic
that the Koran is attached and the birth date 21 September 571 indicates noon. Since then he the moon with 10 ° Aries indicates he must have miscalculated by one day, because there the moon was on 20 September. To the comprehensibility of the text here follows the birth figure for 20 September 571:
All the planets except the moon within 45 degrees. Sun Moon, Mars and Mercury, as well as dragon head and dragon tail near the equinoxes represent an outstanding person, because the darkness of this and the following year in Aries and Libra . Held This leads to Bodin from Plutarch, that the darkness has brought near equinoxes Veränderungenm always great. Saturn and Jupiter joined at the beginning of Scorpius, not far from there the Venus. This is important as if they were connected only by a sextile, and even outside the watery sign. Sun and Mars combined to bring a bold, vorwärtspreschende nature. Mars and Mercury mean in an almost exact conjunction with Spica Virginis grad, [...] an insurgent, robbers and murderers, deceivers [falsarium] and everything else that Roeslin deduced above from the mere triangulation of both planets .- Cardanus wants Spica Virginis in connection with the Christian religion is. Here is the Christian religion would mean big damage, through murder and lies, Marten et propter Mercurium conjunctos Spica. There, however, and if the correct year is 594, the benevolent Jupiter would be at Spica. Now, Mahomet the Christian religion is not done so amicably that it would require in this important .- Moon opposition Mercury mean the great spirit, but also confusion, confusion. Similarly, does the full moon close to the opposition of Mars violent temper. These two interpretations are common astrological rules. 
[2]
Sutorius, according to Kepler, the procedure now that he from Muhammad's natal chart, as it makes it an allegory, and by Directorates wants to derive the mandatory eight significators eight times eight major changes in the Turkish Empire. Kepler deems it better to work with a chart of the Hegira, since this would correspond to a certain extent, the coronation of Mohammed: There is a large in these astrologers Roeslin and Sutorios even be surprised that they meet with the enthronement of absolutely nothing, of of our astrological authorities hold otherwise so much ... It is well known from history, the first of Muharram [Arabic name of the month], beginning from which the Arabs had their Hegira, the day on which Mohammed had been taken off and his bandit gang elected head. After Hegira ie according Scaliger as much as persecuted for reasons of faith, or exile. This first of Muharram of the Hegira begins for Jewish Art on the evening of 15 July, and falls in 16 July, a Friday, AD 622, and the sky is the following figure stood: [2] The following is an interpretation that Kepler (as so often)
prescribed in the rules of the astrologers
not his own are:
No doubt this figure Roeslin Sutorius and ignored because it has not been good for them, but: According astrological teaching is not particularly important here, and Jupiter and Mars in opposite sign, Mars is discarded eighth house, Jupiter is in decline, with Fortune Dragon's Tail in the opposite domicile of Saturn [in Aquarius], that even in his case [ie in lion], the square of the Midheaven. That would be bad meanings. But they also found some things that would have been praise: Jupiter is in his home, in trine to the MC, sun and moon in front, the moon with a dragon head, Regulus and Venus, so that here too the moon again fits admirably. Moreover, the Midheaven at the site of the great conjunction of the years 571 and 630 [ie at the beginning of the scorpion.] Also, the Jupiter, which illuminates the place of the Great Conjunction of 631 cheap [from the fish], while the sun in the third of the watermark is [the cancer]. Because the Midheaven means the rule, these could be subsumed constellation the Great Conjunctions, supporting the argument Roeslin further, the aqueous Trigon would favor the Muslims. But the fire he can not reject [the Muslims consider as irrelevant], because the moon is in it so admirably well. The ruling in this realm polygamy would be a good match for this position of the moon, Venus and Mercury because again mingle with him. Mars as ruler of the Ascendant [by increasing] and of the Midheaven [of domicile], sextile to the Sun and trine the Ascendant means of war, militant rulers in the house of Mercury [Virgin] fraudulent and false. Jupiter, ruler of the sun and moon [ie via Dean?], Means for religious matters derived honor and dominion, and that king and priest is a person. Saturn moon nodes between the lights [also here in the short distance between the Sun and Moon] is tyrannical ruler and destroyer, for strong police and order. All this I have
derived according to the teachings of the astrologers, to show that it Sutorius would not have needed to be in new, inappropriate way from the nativity Mohammed directorates calculate, instead, how teach the astrologers, the horoscopes of the Enthronement be used for the directorates, which will affect the kingdom more than the personal horoscope Mohammed.
probably listed here horoscopes are constructed of Mohammed. The Arabs were the powerful and astrology should their Prophet to an astrologically right time can connect to the world. It is different to the Hegira: Because actually the Hegira began a new time counting, this date is probably correct. The horoscope is also used elsewhere in the astrological literature. [3] proceeds Whether the history of Islam really in concordance with the Directorates of this chart would be to study again. The repeatedly emphasized the context with the mutation of the great conjunctions into the water element (conjunction of 29.8.571 jul. to 3 ° 31 'Scorpio) is certainly worth considering. Also interesting is the allocation of the water element of the fire element to Islam and to Christianity (because the life of Jesus began with the mutation in the fire element) in which Kepler matches apparently Roeslin and Sutorius. [1] Kepler, Judicium de Prognostici Sutorii P. (1604), in: Opera Omnia, ed C. Frisch, Book VIII, p. 302 See http://books.google.de/ebooks/reader?id=-pcqAAAAYAAJ&printsec=frontcover&output=reader
, the report begins on page 300th All the text following quotes are from this report Kepler. The Words I partly transferred to the better understanding in today's German. Comments in square brackets are added by me.
[2] Kepler finds some of these constellations related to those of his present Luther horoscope for the 10th November 1483, 11 Hour - and noted at this point that there is a dispute over the correct date of birth of Luther. [3] Thus, in José Luis San Miguel de Pablos, Uranus-Neptune conjunctions
, publishing here and now, Hamburg 1993, p. 35 He is concerned with the Uranus-Neptune conjunction of 18.9.623 jul. Which begins to take shape in the Hegira chart already.
Thursday, February 10, 2011
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)